>>> Building on exopi-2 under x11/awesome BDEPENDS = [graphics/ImageMagick;graphics/cairo;x11/libxdg-basedir;x11/xkbcommon;lang/lua/5.3;archivers/xz;devel/lua-lgi,lua53;devel/pango;x11/dbus;graphics/gdk-pixbuf2;textproc/asciidoctor;devel/ninja;devel/cmake/core;devel/startup-notification] DIST = [x11/awesome:awesome-4.3.tar.xz] FULLPKGNAME = awesome-4.3p3 RDEPENDS = [graphics/cairo;x11/libxdg-basedir;lang/lua/5.3;x11/xkbcommon;devel/lua-lgi,lua53;devel/pango;shells/bash;misc/rlwrap;x11/dbus;graphics/gdk-pixbuf2;devel/startup-notification] (Junk lock obtained for exopi-2 at 1778368197.25) >>> Running depends in x11/awesome at 1778368197.30 last junk was in net/loudmouth /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair ImageMagick-6.9.13.43 asciidoctor-2.0.26 cairo-1.18.4 cmake-core-4.2.3 gdk-pixbuf-2.44.6 libxdg-basedir-1.2.0p2 libxkbcommon-1.13.1 lua-5.3.6p0 lua53-lgi-0.9.2p0 ninja-1.11.1p1v1 pango-1.57.1 startup-notification-0.12p9 was: /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair ImageMagick-6.9.13.43 asciidoctor-2.0.26 cairo-1.18.4 cmake-core-4.2.3 dbus-1.16.2p1v0 gdk-pixbuf-2.44.6 libxdg-basedir-1.2.0p2 libxkbcommon-1.13.1 lua-5.3.6p0 lua53-lgi-0.9.2p0 ninja-1.11.1p1v1 pango-1.57.1 startup-notification-0.12p9 xz-5.8.3 /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair ImageMagick-6.9.13.43 asciidoctor-2.0.26 cairo-1.18.4 cmake-core-4.2.3 gdk-pixbuf-2.44.6 libxdg-basedir-1.2.0p2 libxkbcommon-1.13.1 lua-5.3.6p0 lua53-lgi-0.9.2p0 ninja-1.11.1p1v1 pango-1.57.1 startup-notification-0.12p9 >>> Running show-prepare-results in x11/awesome at 1778368200.36 ===> x11/awesome ===> Building from scratch awesome-4.3p3 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: pango-* -> pango-1.57.1 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: ImageMagick-* -> ImageMagick-6.9.13.43 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: asciidoctor-* -> asciidoctor-2.0.26 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: cmake-core->=4 -> cmake-core-4.2.3 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: ninja-* -> ninja-1.11.1p1v1 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: lua53-lgi-* -> lua53-lgi-0.9.2p0 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: lua->=5.3,<5.4 -> lua-5.3.6p0 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: xz->=5.4.0 -> xz-5.8.3 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: startup-notification-* -> startup-notification-0.12p9 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: cairo-* -> cairo-1.18.4 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: gdk-pixbuf-* -> gdk-pixbuf-2.44.6 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: dbus-* -> dbus-1.16.2p1v0 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: libxdg-basedir-* -> libxdg-basedir-1.2.0p2 ===> awesome-4.3p3 depends on: libxkbcommon-* -> libxkbcommon-1.13.1 ===> Verifying specs: X11 c cairo dbus-1 execinfo gdk_pixbuf-2.0 glib-2.0 gobject-2.0 intl lua5.3 m startup-notification-1 xcb xcb-cursor xcb-icccm xcb-keysyms xcb-randr xcb-render xcb-shape xcb-util xcb-xinerama xcb-xkb xcb-xrm xcb-xtest xdg-basedir xkbcommon xkbcommon-x11 lua5.3 ===> found X11.19.0 c.103.0 cairo.13.5 dbus-1.11.4 execinfo.4.0 gdk_pixbuf-2.0.3200.3 glib-2.0.4201.16 gobject-2.0.4200.23 intl.8.2 lua5.3.5.3 m.10.1 startup-notification-1.2.0 xcb.4.1 xcb-cursor.0.0 xcb-icccm.4.0 xcb-keysyms.3.0 xcb-randr.2.3 xcb-render.1.1 xcb-shape.1.1 xcb-util.0.0 xcb-xinerama.1.0 xcb-xkb.0.1 xcb-xrm.0.0 xcb-xtest.1.0 xdg-basedir.2.0 xkbcommon.4.2 xkbcommon-x11.2.5 ImageMagick-6.9.13.43 asciidoctor-2.0.26 cairo-1.18.4 cmake-core-4.2.3 dbus-1.16.2p1v0 gdk-pixbuf-2.44.6 libxdg-basedir-1.2.0p2 libxkbcommon-1.13.1 lua-5.3.6p0 lua53-lgi-0.9.2p0 ninja-1.11.1p1v1 pango-1.57.1 startup-notification-0.12p9 xz-5.8.3 Don't run junk because nojunk in x11/qt5/qtlocation (Junk lock released for exopi-2 at 1778368202.72) distfiles size=1037816 >>> Running build in x11/awesome at 1778368202.76 ===> x11/awesome ===> Checking files for awesome-4.3p3 `/exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/awesome-4.3.tar.xz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) all files: OK ===> Extracting for awesome-4.3p3 ===> Patching for awesome-4.3p3 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-CMakeLists_txt Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: CMakeLists.txt |--- CMakeLists.txt.orig |+++ CMakeLists.txt -------------------------- Patching file CMakeLists.txt using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 454. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-awesomeConfig_cmake Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: awesomeConfig.cmake |--- awesomeConfig.cmake.orig |+++ awesomeConfig.cmake -------------------------- Patching file awesomeConfig.cmake using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 365. Hunk #2 succeeded at 375. Hunk #3 succeeded at 392. Hunk #4 succeeded at 401. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-awesomerc_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: awesomerc.lua |--- awesomerc.lua.orig |+++ awesomerc.lua -------------------------- Patching file awesomerc.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 53. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-common_lualib_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: common/lualib.c |--- common/lualib.c.orig |+++ common/lualib.c -------------------------- Patching file common/lualib.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-common_lualib_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: common/lualib.h |--- common/lualib.h.orig |+++ common/lualib.h -------------------------- Patching file common/lualib.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-docs_05-awesomerc_md_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: docs/05-awesomerc.md.lua |--- docs/05-awesomerc.md.lua.orig |+++ docs/05-awesomerc.md.lua -------------------------- Patching file docs/05-awesomerc.md.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-docs_06-appearance_md_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: docs/06-appearance.md.lua |--- docs/06-appearance.md.lua.orig |+++ docs/06-appearance.md.lua -------------------------- Patching file docs/06-appearance.md.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-docs_07-my-first-awesome_md Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: docs/07-my-first-awesome.md |--- docs/07-my-first-awesome.md.orig |+++ docs/07-my-first-awesome.md -------------------------- Patching file docs/07-my-first-awesome.md using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 76. Hunk #2 succeeded at 87. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-docs_90-FAQ_md Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: docs/90-FAQ.md |--- docs/90-FAQ.md.orig |+++ docs/90-FAQ.md -------------------------- Patching file docs/90-FAQ.md using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 389. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-docs_build_rules_index_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: docs/build_rules_index.lua |--- docs/build_rules_index.lua.orig |+++ docs/build_rules_index.lua -------------------------- Patching file docs/build_rules_index.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lib_awful_completion_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lib/awful/completion.lua |--- lib/awful/completion.lua.orig |+++ lib/awful/completion.lua -------------------------- Patching file lib/awful/completion.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. Hunk #2 succeeded at 123. Hunk #3 succeeded at 141. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lib_awful_util_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lib/awful/util.lua |--- lib/awful/util.lua.orig |+++ lib/awful/util.lua -------------------------- Patching file lib/awful/util.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 222. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lib_beautiful_init_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lib/beautiful/init.lua |--- lib/beautiful/init.lua.orig |+++ lib/beautiful/init.lua -------------------------- Patching file lib/beautiful/init.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 91. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lib_gears_filesystem_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lib/gears/filesystem.lua |--- lib/gears/filesystem.lua.orig |+++ lib/gears/filesystem.lua -------------------------- Patching file lib/gears/filesystem.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 103. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lib_menubar_icon_theme_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lib/menubar/icon_theme.lua |--- lib/menubar/icon_theme.lua.orig |+++ lib/menubar/icon_theme.lua -------------------------- Patching file lib/menubar/icon_theme.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lib_menubar_utils_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lib/menubar/utils.lua |--- lib/menubar/utils.lua.orig |+++ lib/menubar/utils.lua -------------------------- Patching file lib/menubar/utils.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 170. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lib_naughty_core_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lib/naughty/core.lua |--- lib/naughty/core.lua.orig |+++ lib/naughty/core.lua -------------------------- Patching file lib/naughty/core.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-luaa_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: luaa.c |--- luaa.c.orig |+++ luaa.c -------------------------- Patching file luaa.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 77. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-luaa_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: luaa.h |--- luaa.h.orig |+++ luaa.h -------------------------- Patching file luaa.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 311. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_button_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/button.c |--- objects/button.c.orig |+++ objects/button.c -------------------------- Patching file objects/button.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_button_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/button.h |--- objects/button.h.orig |+++ objects/button.h -------------------------- Patching file objects/button.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_client_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/client.c |--- objects/client.c.orig |+++ objects/client.c -------------------------- Patching file objects/client.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 106. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/client.h |--- objects/client.h.orig |+++ objects/client.h -------------------------- Patching file objects/client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 192. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_drawin_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/drawin.c |--- objects/drawin.c.orig |+++ objects/drawin.c -------------------------- Patching file objects/drawin.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_drawin_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/drawin.h |--- objects/drawin.h.orig |+++ objects/drawin.h -------------------------- Patching file objects/drawin.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_key_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/key.c |--- objects/key.c.orig |+++ objects/key.c -------------------------- Patching file objects/key.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_key_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/key.h |--- objects/key.h.orig |+++ objects/key.h -------------------------- Patching file objects/key.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_tag_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/tag.c |--- objects/tag.c.orig |+++ objects/tag.c -------------------------- Patching file objects/tag.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 190. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_tag_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/tag.h |--- objects/tag.h.orig |+++ objects/tag.h -------------------------- Patching file objects/tag.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_window_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/window.c |--- objects/window.c.orig |+++ objects/window.c -------------------------- Patching file objects/window.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-objects_window_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix -fno-common build failure. Taken from |https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/commit/d256d9055095f27a33696e0aeda4ee20ed4fb1a0 | |Index: objects/window.h |--- objects/window.h.orig |+++ objects/window.h -------------------------- Patching file objects/window.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 80. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tests_examples_CMakeLists_txt Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt |--- tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt.orig |+++ tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt -------------------------- Patching file tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 30. Hunk #3 succeeded at 38. Hunk #4 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tests_examples_runner_sh Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tests/examples/runner.sh |--- tests/examples/runner.sh.orig |+++ tests/examples/runner.sh -------------------------- Patching file tests/examples/runner.sh using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-themes_default_theme_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: themes/default/theme.lua |--- themes/default/theme.lua.orig |+++ themes/default/theme.lua -------------------------- Patching file themes/default/theme.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 123. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-themes_gtk_theme_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: themes/gtk/theme.lua |--- themes/gtk/theme.lua.orig |+++ themes/gtk/theme.lua -------------------------- Patching file themes/gtk/theme.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 310. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-themes_xresources_theme_lua Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: themes/xresources/theme.lua |--- themes/xresources/theme.lua.orig |+++ themes/xresources/theme.lua -------------------------- Patching file themes/xresources/theme.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 94. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-utils_awesome-client Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: utils/awesome-client |--- utils/awesome-client.orig |+++ utils/awesome-client -------------------------- Patching file utils/awesome-client using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Compiler link: clang -> /usr/bin/clang ===> Compiler link: clang++ -> /usr/bin/clang++ ===> Compiler link: cc -> /usr/bin/cc ===> Compiler link: c++ -> /usr/bin/c++ ===> Generating configure for awesome-4.3p3 ===> Configuring for awesome-4.3p3 /usr/bin/perl /exopi-cvs/ports/infrastructure/bin/pkg_subst -DMODCMAKE_BUILD_SUFFIX=-release.cmake -DMODLUA_VERSION=5.3 -DMODLUA_LIB=-llua5.3 -DMODLUA_INCL_DIR=/usr/local/include/lua-5.3/ -DMODLUA_EXAMPLEDIR=/usr/local/share/examples/awesome-4.3p3/ -DMODLUA_DOCDIR=/usr/local/share/doc/awesome-4.3p3/ -DMODLUA_LIBDIR=/usr/local/lib/lua/5.3/ -DMODLUA_DATADIR=/usr/local/share/lua/5.3/ -DMODLUA_DEP=lua53 -DMODLUA_DEP_VERSION=53 -DMODLUA_BIN=/usr/local/bin/lua53 -DARCH=amd64 -DBASE_PKGPATH=x11/awesome -DFLAVOR_EXT= -DFULLPKGNAME=awesome-4.3p3 -DHOMEPAGE=https://awesomewm.org/ -DLOCALBASE=/usr/local -DLOCALSTATEDIR=/var -DMACHINE_ARCH=amd64 -DMAINTAINER=The\ OpenBSD\ ports\ mailing-list\ \ -DPREFIX=/usr/local -DRCDIR=/etc/rc.d -DSYSCONFDIR=/etc -DTRUEPREFIX=/usr/local -DX11BASE=/usr/X11R6 -DPKGSTEM=awesome -i -B /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3 /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/awesomeConfig.cmake /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/lib/naughty/core.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/lib/menubar/utils.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/lib/menubar/icon_theme.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/lib/gears/filesystem.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/lib/beautiful/init.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/lib/awful/util.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/lib/awful/completion.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/utils/awesome-client /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/themes/xresources/theme.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/themes/gtk/theme.lua /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/themes/default/theme.lua CMake Deprecation Warning at CMakeLists.txt:1 (cmake_minimum_required): Compatibility with CMake < 3.10 will be removed from a future version of CMake. Update the VERSION argument value. Or, use the ... syntax to tell CMake that the project requires at least but has been updated to work with policies introduced by or earlier. -- The C compiler identification is Clang 19.1.7 -- Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done -- Check for working C compiler: /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/bin/cc - skipped -- Detecting C compile features -- Detecting C compile features - done CMake Deprecation Warning at CMakeLists.txt:21 (cmake_policy): Compatibility with CMake < 3.10 will be removed from a future version of CMake. Update the VERSION argument value. Or, use the ... syntax to tell CMake that the project requires at least but has been updated to work with policies introduced by or earlier. -- git not found. -- asciidoctor -> /usr/local/bin/asciidoctor -- gzip -> /usr/bin/gzip -- Not generating API documentation. -- convert -> /usr/local/bin/convert -- Found PkgConfig: /usr/bin/pkg-config (found version "2.4.3") -- Found Lua: /usr/local/lib/liblua5.3.so.5.3;/usr/lib/libm.so.10.1 (found version "5.3.6") -- Using version from /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/.version_stamp: v4.3 -- Checking for module 'xcb>=1.6' -- Found xcb, version 1.17.0 -- Checking for modules 'glib-2.0;glib-2.0>=2.40;gdk-pixbuf-2.0;cairo;x11;xcb-cursor;xcb-randr;xcb-xtest;xcb-xinerama;xcb-shape;xcb-util;xcb-util>=0.3.8;xcb-keysyms;xcb-keysyms>=0.3.4;xcb-icccm;xcb-icccm>=0.3.8;xcb-xkb;xkbcommon;xkbcommon-x11;cairo-xcb;libstartup-notification-1.0;libstartup-notification-1.0>=0.10;xproto;xproto>=7.0.15;libxdg-basedir;libxdg-basedir>=1.0.0;xcb-xrm' -- Found glib-2.0, version 2.88.1 -- Found glib-2.0, version 2.88.1 -- Found gdk-pixbuf-2.0, version 2.44.6 -- Found cairo, version 1.18.4 -- Found x11, version 1.8.12 -- Found xcb-cursor, version 0.1.6 -- Found xcb-randr, version 1.17.0 -- Found xcb-xtest, version 1.17.0 -- Found xcb-xinerama, version 1.17.0 -- Found xcb-shape, version 1.17.0 -- Found xcb-util, version 0.4.1 -- Found xcb-util, version 0.4.1 -- Found xcb-keysyms, version 0.4.1 -- Found xcb-keysyms, version 0.4.1 -- Found xcb-icccm, version 0.4.2 -- Found xcb-icccm, version 0.4.2 -- Found xcb-xkb, version 1.17.0 -- Found xkbcommon, version 1.13.1 -- Found xkbcommon-x11, version 1.13.1 -- Found cairo-xcb, version 1.18.4 -- Found libstartup-notification-1.0, version 0.12 -- Found libstartup-notification-1.0, version 0.12 -- Found xproto, version 7.0.33 -- Found xproto, version 7.0.33 -- Found libxdg-basedir, version 1.2.0 -- Found libxdg-basedir, version 1.2.0 -- Found xcb-xrm, version 1.0 -- Looking for backtrace_symbols -- Looking for backtrace_symbols - not found -- checking for execinfo -- found -- Looking for round -- Looking for round - not found -- Looking for round -- Looking for round - found -- checking for round -- in libm -- Checking for module 'dbus-1' -- Found dbus-1, version 1.16.2 CMake Warning (dev) at awesomeConfig.cmake:359 (add_custom_command): Exactly one of PRE_BUILD, PRE_LINK, or POST_BUILD must be given. Assuming POST_BUILD to preserve backward compatibility. Policy CMP0175 is not set: add_custom_command() rejects invalid arguments. Run "cmake --help-policy CMP0175" for policy details. Use the cmake_policy command to set the policy and suppress this warning. Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:33 (include) This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. -- busted not found. -- luacheck not found. -- Checking if 'package' target should be generated. -- rpmbuild not found. -- The 'package' target will not build a RPM. -- dpkg not found. -- The 'package' target will not build a DEB. -- Skipping generation of 'package' target. -- Configuring done (3.5s) -- Generating done (0.1s) CMake Warning: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project: CMAKE_ASM_COMPILER_AR CMAKE_ASM_COMPILER_RANLIB CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_AR CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_RANLIB CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER_AR CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER_RANLIB CMAKE_OBJCXX_COMPILER_AR CMAKE_OBJCXX_COMPILER_RANLIB CMAKE_OBJC_COMPILER_AR CMAKE_OBJC_COMPILER_RANLIB -- Build files have been written to: /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64 ===> Building for awesome-4.3p3 Change Dir: '/exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64' Run Build Command(s): /usr/local/bin/ninja -v -j 1 [1/84] /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/bin/cc -I/usr/local/include/lua-5.3 -I/exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/libpng16 -I/usr/X11R6/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11R6/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/local/include/startup-notification-1.0 -I/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/../../include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/../../lib/dbus-1.0/include -O2 -pipe -DNDEBUG -MD -MT CMakeFiles/lgi-check.dir/build-utils/lgi-check.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/lgi-check.dir/build-utils/lgi-check.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/lgi-check.dir/build-utils/lgi-check.c.o -c /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/build-utils/lgi-check.c [2/84] : && /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DNDEBUG -Xlinker --dependency-file=CMakeFiles/lgi-check.dir/link.d CMakeFiles/lgi-check.dir/build-utils/lgi-check.c.o -o lgi-check -Wl,-z,origin,-rpath,/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/liblua5.3.so.5.3 /usr/lib/libm.so.10.1 -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/local/lib && : [3/84] /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/bin/cc -I/exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/libpng16 -I/usr/X11R6/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11R6/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/local/include/startup-notification-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/lua-5.3 -I/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/../../include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/../../lib/dbus-1.0/include -O2 -pipe -DNDEBUG -MD -MT CMakeFiles/test-gravity.dir/tests/test-gravity.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/test-gravity.dir/tests/test-gravity.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/test-gravity.dir/tests/test-gravity.c.o -c /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/tests/test-gravity.c /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/tests/test-gravity.c:375:13: warning: enumeration value 'TEST_STATE_DONE_GOT_CONFIGURE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch] 375 | switch (window_state.state) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/tests/test-gravity.c:426:18: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses [-Wparentheses] 426 | while (event = xcb_wait_for_event(c)) { | ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/tests/test-gravity.c:426:18: note: place parentheses around the assignment to silence this warning 426 | while (event = xcb_wait_for_event(c)) { | ^ | ( ) /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/tests/test-gravity.c:426:18: note: use '==' to turn this assignment into an equality comparison 426 | while (event = xcb_wait_for_event(c)) { | ^ | == /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/awesome-4.3/tests/test-gravity.c:462:13: warning: enumeration values 'TEST_STATE_DONE' and 'TEST_STATE_DONE_GOT_CONFIGURE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch] 462 | switch (window_state.state) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 warnings generated. [4/84] : && /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -DNDEBUG -Xlinker --dependency-file=CMakeFiles/test-gravity.dir/link.d CMakeFiles/test-gravity.dir/tests/test-gravity.c.o -o test-gravity -Wl,-z,origin,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lxcb -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lxcb -L/usr/local/lib -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lxcb-cursor -lxcb-randr -lxcb-xtest -lxcb-xinerama -lxcb-shape -lxcb-util -lxcb-keysyms -lxcb-icccm -lxkbcommon-x11 -lxkbcommon -lxcb-xkb -lcairo -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lxcb-render -lstartup-notification-1 -lxdg-basedir -lxcb-xrm -lxcb /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.4.0 -lm /usr/local/lib/liblua5.3.so.5.3 /usr/lib/libm.so.10.1 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -lxcb-cursor -lxcb-randr -lxcb-xtest -lxcb-xinerama -lxcb-shape -lxcb-util -lxcb-keysyms -lxcb-icccm -lxkbcommon-x11 -lxkbcommon -lxcb-xkb -lcairo -lX11 -lxcb-render -lstartup-notification-1 -lxdg-basedir -lxcb-xrm /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.4.0 -lm /usr/local/lib/liblua5.3.so.5.3 /usr/lib/libm.so.10.1 -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/local/lib && : [5/84] cd /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64 && /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64/lgi-check FAILED: CMakeFiles/lgi-check-run /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64/CMakeFiles/lgi-check-run cd /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64 && /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64/lgi-check Building for Lua 5.3. Found lgi 0.9.2. Error: /usr/local/share/lua/5.3/lgi/ffi.lua:87: bad argument #1 to 'fromarray' (lgi.record expected, got table) WARNING ======= The lgi check failed. Awesome needs lgi to run. Add AWESOME_IGNORE_LGI=1 to your environment to continue. ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. *** Error 1 in x11/awesome (/exopi-cvs/ports/devel/cmake/cmake.port.mk:40 'do-build': @cd /exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64 && exec /u...) *** Error 2 in x11/awesome (/exopi-cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:3059 '/exopi-obj/pobj/awesome-4.3/build-amd64/.build_done': @cd /...) *** Error 2 in x11/awesome (/exopi-cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2706 'build': @lock=awesome-4.3p3; export _LOCKS_HELD=" awesome-...) ===> Exiting x11/awesome with an error *** Error 1 in /exopi-cvs/ports (infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk:144 'build': @: ${echo_msg:=echo}; : ${target:=build}; for i in ; do...) >>> Ended at 1778368208.13 max_stuck=0.00/depends=3.06/show-prepare-results=2.40/build=5.42 Error: job failed with 512 on exopi-2 at 1778368208